Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  192 / 365 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 192 / 365 Next Page
Page Background

© 2014 Foundation Supportworks

®

,

Inc.

All Rights Reserved

p 192

APPENDIX 2G

GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Chapter 2

Helical Foundation Systems

6. Helical bearing within soft or sensitive clays should be avoided due to long term settlement or

creep effects. Pile/anchor capacities should be limited when helix plates bear within medium stiff

clay or loose sands, and a higher factor of safety (FOS ≥ 3) may also be considered to reduce

potential long term settlement or creep.

7. Groundwater levels should be accurately identified during the geotechnical investigation,

particularly for sites with granular soils. The presence of groundwater above the anticipated

bearing depths of the helix plates may significantly reduce the effective overburden stresses,

thereby reducing pile capacities in granular soils. Groundwater table fluctuations should

be considered for the pile/anchor design and installation. The highest potential groundwater

elevation should be used for design of the helix plate configuration and the current groundwater

elevation should be used for the determination of installation torque requirements with that given

plate configuration.

8. The presence of rubble fill, construction debris, or fill soils containing cobbles or boulders should

be identified. Large, hard fractions within fill soils would likely stop advancement of the helical

pile or anchor. Pre-drilling or removal of the hard fractions may be required to allow helical piles/

anchors to penetrate these soils and reach a suitable bearing stratum.

9. When project characteristics or site conditions warrant, the Owner and his/her team of Design

Professionals may elect to determine the corrosive characteristics of the soils. Geotechnical or

environmental consultants may classify soils as corrosive based on visual review of soil samples,

from soil survey maps of the area, or from the results of additional testing. At a minimum, pH and

resistivity testing are required for a corrosion analysis. Multi-directional field resistivity testing is

preferred over laboratory resistivity testing. For a more complete corrosion analysis, chemical

analyses may be completed to determine specific concentration levels. Corrosive characteristics

of the soil should be determined from the ground surface to the bearing elevation of the deep

foundation, if practical.

10. Soil strength parameters should be determined for the top 10 feet of the soil profile when helical

piles are subjected to lateral loading. Continuous sampling or continuous in situ testing methods

should be used within this zone in order to estimate the lateral load capacity of the pile. For

critical projects, consideration could be given to special sampling and testing techniques such

as pressuremeter testing; otherwise typical sampling and testing methods as described above

may be suitable.

Alternative Methods of Developing Geotechnical Design Information

For many projects, an appropriate level of geotechnical information has not been obtained prior

to initiating a preliminary design for helical piles and push piers. New construction helical piles are

often an afterthought following a shallow geotechnical investigation and discovery of weak, near-

surface soils. Helical piles are then listed in the geotechnical report or on the project plans as a

deep foundation alternative, but additional or deeper test borings are rarely completed to adequately

identify the soil strength parameters for the deeper bearing soils. In additional to a geotechnical

investigation, there are other potential sources or methods for obtaining geotechnical information for

a preliminary design.