Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  37 / 365 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 365 Next Page
Page Background

© 2014 Foundation Supportworks

®

,

Inc.

All Rights Reserved

p 37

Chapter 2

Helical Foundation Systems

CHAPTER 2

HELICAL FOUNDATION SYSTEMS

The design procedure for helical soil nails is

similar to that for grouted nails. For a helical soil

nail, the bond stress with the soil is assumed

to act along a cylindrical surface area defined

by the outside edge of the helix plates. Bearing

capacity of the soil nail is determined using the

Individual Bearing Method described in Section

2.7 and is correlated to bond stress by:

q

u

= Q

u

/ LπD

h

FS

Where,

q

u

= Ultimate Bond Stress (psi)

Q

u

= Ultimate Capacity of the Helical Soil Nail

by Individual Bearing Method (lb)

L

= Soil Nail Length (in)

D

h

= Helix Diameter (in)

FS

= Factor of Safety for Uncertainties in Soil

Conditions (Typically 1.5 to 2.0 Based on

Quality of Soil Information)

As the construction of the wall progresses, the

upper soil nails become less important for the

stabilization of the soil mass, and depending

upon wall height, may not contribute to the global

stability at the final excavation phase. However,

the upper soil nails are instrumental in providing

stability during the early phases of excavation

and contribute to limiting wall deflections.

Figure

2.9.2.a

shows the distribution of tensile force in

Nail 1, cumulative wall movement and the critical

failure surfaces as the soil nail wall construction

progresses. The upper schematic of

Figure

2.9.2.a

illustrates the tensile force distribution

along the top soil nail as construction continues

through the various excavation phases. Phase

N in the upper schematic does not reflect the

maximum soil nail tensile force since additional

loading occurs after construction to reach long

term equilibrium of soil nail forces.

The design of helical soil nail walls should

be performed in general accordance with

Figure 2.9.2.a

Potential failure surfaces and soil

nail tensile forces

(Lazarte, Elias et al. 2003)