Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  234 / 365 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 234 / 365 Next Page
Page Background

© 2014 Foundation Supportworks

®

,

Inc.

All Rights Reserved

p 234

Chapter 3

Hydraulically-Driven Push Piers

CHAPTER 3

HYDRAULICALLY-DRIVEN PUSH PIERS

3.9 Push Pier

Capacity and Spacing

Foundation Supportworks offers multiple pier

sizes and bracket assembly combinations to

provide solutions for varying applications and

design loads. A main design consideration for

eccentrically-loadedretrofitsystemsisminimizing

bracket rotation. This is accomplished not only

by designing a stiffer pier system, but also by the

system’s interaction with the surrounding soil

and the structure. Sections 3.3.1.1 and 3.3.1.2

discuss the bending forces that are generated

by the eccentric loading condition and how

the FSI external sleeve resists the bending

force below the bracket. The near-surface soils

surrounding the bracket, the external sleeve and

the upper sections of pier tube therefore act to

resist and dissipate the bending. Finite element

analysis software was used to analyze how the

external sleeve and pier interact with various soil

types and strengths. The standard 48-inch long

external sleeve was thereby selected to provide

an efficient use of additional steel to resist most,

if not all, of the bending force when piers are

installed within somewhat typical near-surface

soil conditions; i.e., loose sands and medium

stiff clays, or stronger. Although laboratory

testing cannot exactly duplicate actual installed

field conditions with all possible soil types

and strengths, the results from the standard

test method utilized (ICC-ES AC406) generally

confirmed these calculated capacities.

Retrofit bracket testing in accordance with

AC406 also considers interaction of the bracket

with a concrete block of known compressive

strength (2,500 psi). Testing pier systems

against concrete is completely logical as it

includes concrete failure as a potential failure

mechanism of the “system”. Bracket testing

within a rigid steel frame does little to simulate

field behaviors and failure conditions, and these

capacities could rarely be duplicated in the field

without first buckling the pier and/or breaking

the concrete footing. FSI determines push pier

capacities by testing in general accordance with

AC406 and, as a result, our pier systems may

appear to be conservatively rated versus other

published system capacities. Even so, AC406 is

an appropriate test method for determining push

pier system capacities, and the only standard

currently available.

Push pier system ultimate capacities may

be limited by the ability of the structure and

surrounding soil to provide the necessary

reaction to drive the piers. Light structures

or structures with shallow footings may start

to mobilize before the target drive load is

achieved. In such cases, it may prove beneficial

to excavate small, shallow holes at the pier

locations, instead of a full excavation, to allow as

much soil load as practical to remain around and

beneath the footing. The soil load can contribute

significantly to “hold” a light structure down in

order to achieve target pressures/loads. When

a structure experiences early lift, the project

engineer should evaluate if the drive pressure/

load is adequate, if adjustments can be made

to the proposed piering plan, or if a change to

retrofit helical piers should be considered. Helical

piers are installed by the application of torque

with machines independent of the structure.

Helical piers are discussed in Chapter 2.

A structural assessment should be performed

prior to installation to determine if the existing

footing, stem wall or floor slab can resist the

estimated final drive force without structural

damage. Overstressing the concrete can be

prevented or at least minimized by following

proper techniques and best practices for footing

preparation and pier installation. The contractor

should carefully monitor the installation and

release the load at the first sign of foundation or

slab distress.

Stone or cobble foundations, brick foundations,

or foundations that are severely broken or

deteriorated may not be good candidates for

retrofit foundation piers. Foundations and slabs

must be able to span between pier locations for

the system to be effective. Pier locations and pier

spacing are often determined by the spanning