Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  235 / 365 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 235 / 365 Next Page
Page Background

© 2014 Foundation Supportworks

®

,

Inc.

All Rights Reserved

p 235

Chapter 3

Hydraulically-Driven Push Piers

CHAPTER 3

HYDRAULICALLY-DRIVEN PUSH PIERS

capability of unreinforced or under-reinforced

footings, foundation walls and floor slabs, and

not by the pier’s capacity. Monolithic footings,

footings with short stem walls or footings with

masonry stem walls may require closer pier

spacing and/or additional support at the bracket

locations. Spanning capability of a footing may

be improved by using structural steel angles,

plate, tube, etc. sandwiched between the bottom

of the footing and the horizontal bearing plate of

an under-footing bracket. In more severe cases;

e.g., stone, cobble, brick and highly deteriorated

foundations, the footings can be temporarily

undermined in short sections to construct a

continuously reinforced concrete grade beam.

The grade beam would then provide adequate

spanning capability for the installation of the

retrofit piers.

With all the discussion above, a push pier

system can still only provide support for the

structure if competent soils are encountered at

the pier tip. Typically, SPT N-values of 35 to 40

blows per foot for clay soils and 30 to 35 blows

per foot for granular soils are needed to provide

the necessary end bearing resistance for light to

moderate push pier loads. See Appendix 2G for

additional information regarding geotechnical

considerations for push pier systems.

Technical specifications and capacities for FSI

push pier systems are provided in Appendix 3A.

3.9.1 Factor of Safety

The push pier system develops a factor of safety

against pier settlement by the pier installation

methods used and the sequence with which

multiple piers are driven and then re-loaded. Piers

are first driven individually using the maximum

weight of the structure and any contributory soil

load as the reaction. The pier gathers load from

adjacent sections of the foundation, not just in

the immediate area of the pier. The more rigid

the structure, the more load can be transferred

to the pier during the drive process. It is for this

reason, along with consideration of contributory

soil load against the foundation, that piers can

be driven to loads greater than the calculated

service loads.

The drive or installation force on the piers is

determined by calculating the structural load

(dead plus live) and the soil load on each pier,

then multiplying by a factor of safety. Factors of

safety of 1.5 to 2.0 are commonly used for push

pier systems since the drive and lock-off loads

are easily measured and verified using hydraulic

cylinders, pumps and gauges. Foundation

Supportworks does not recommend the use of

bottle jacks for the drive or lift operations of a

push pier installation. Loads applied with bottle

jacks are unknown and not easily determined.

Higher factors of safety may be considered

at the discretion of the project engineer or as

dictated by local codes.

Piers are driven to the calculated “ultimate”

load, or until lift of the structure occurs.

After all of the piers are driven, the piers are

connected in series with hydraulic lift cylinders

and re-loaded to either the design service load

to stabilize the structure, or until the desired

lift is achieved. The total reaction load is then

distributed over the multiple pier locations. The

final factor of safety against pier settlement at

each pier location is calculated by dividing the

drive load by the lock-off load.

As discussed in Section 3.3.2.1, additional

skin friction develops over time as the soils

heal around the pier shaft. The factor of

safety generally increases with an increase in

frictional capacity.

3.9.2 Bolting the Under-Footing

Bracket to the Foundation

Foundation Supportworks does not require nor

recommend bolting of under-footing brackets

to a concrete foundation with expansion or

adhesive anchors. Experience has shown that

bolting to unreinforced or under-reinforced

concrete routinely causes concrete to crack

and spall during installation of the expansion

or adhesive anchors, or during the repeated